Brown AN—Open Access Rheumatology, 2016
Acthar Gel was evaluated in patients with PsA who had previously been on ≥1 therapies and were experiencing ongoing disease activity1
STUDY OBJECTIVE
A retrospective case series of 9 patients with refractory PsA1
- Refractory PsA was defined as failure to achieve disease remission with previous treatment
- Patients had previously failed 1 or more therapies and were experiencing ongoing disease activity prior to treatment with Acthar Gel
- Six patients were evaluated using Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3)*
- Acthar Gel was initiated to help manage active disease or as a bridge therapy to manage symptoms during transition to new treatment
- Acthar Gel was initiated at 80 U subcutaneously (SC) twice weekly and titrated based on patient response
*The RAPID3 score is the sum of 3 patient self-reported scores on the Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ). Pain, physical function, and patient global assessment are rated by the patient on a 0-10 visual analogue scale (VAS).2 The score does not include physician assessment of tender or swollen joint count, peripheral joint symptoms, skin symptoms, dactylitis, enthesitis, nail symptoms, or spine symptoms typically associated with PsA. The final score is calculated by the treating healthcare professional and recorded on a 0-30 scale: 1-3=near remission; 4-6=low severity; 7-12=moderate severity; and 13-30=high severity.2-4
Study Limitations
Results are based on a retrospective case series of 9 patients and may not be fully representative of outcomes in the overall patient population. Some patients were on other therapies. The clinical outcomes may not be solely attributable to Acthar Gel.
The majority of patients experienced improvement with Acthar Gel
- Of 9 patients with joint disease, 8 experienced improvement that continued during treatment; 1 experienced short-term improvement
- Of 8 patients with active skin disease, 6 experienced lasting improvement that continued during treatment; 2 experienced short-term improvement
Case Summaries1
Review results for individual patients in the series.
Patient | Previous treatments | Disease at baseline | Treatment with Acthar Gel |
RAPID3 disease activity measures |
Case 1: 88-year-old female |
Golimumab + Infliximab |
|
|
Baseline: 20.7 After 4 weeks: 14.3 |
Disease duration: 20+ yrs |
||||
Case 2: 46-year-old male |
Adalimumab |
|
|
Baseline: 7.5 After ~12 weeks: 6.2 |
Disease duration: 1.5 yrs |
||||
Case 3: 51-year-old female |
Certolizumab |
|
|
Baseline: 9.7 After 8 weeks: 3.0 |
Disease duration: 5 yrs |
||||
Case 4: 55-year-old female |
Etanercept |
|
|
Baseline: 19.3 After 8 weeks: 3.0 |
Disease duration: 7.5 yrs |
||||
Case 5: 58-year-old male |
Adalimumab |
|
|
Baseline: 8.3 After 12 weeks: 6.0 |
Disease duration: 8 yrs |
||||
Case 6: 66-year-old female |
Methotrexate |
|
|
Not recorded |
Disease duration: 5 yrs |
||||
Case 7: 37-year-old male |
Adalimumab |
|
|
Baseline: 4.0 After 3 months: 2.8 |
Disease duration: 2 yrs |
||||
Case 8: 69-year-old female |
Adalimumab |
|
|
Not recorded |
Disease duration: 7 yrs |
||||
Case 9: 48-year-old female |
Adalimumab |
|
|
Not recorded |
Disease duration: 19 yrs |
CRP=C-reactive protein; ESR=erythrocyte sedimentation rate; PIP=proximal interphalangeal.
Case Summaries1
Review results for individual patients in the series.
Case 1: 88-year-old female
Disease duration: 20+ yrs
Previous treatments |
Golimumab + Etanercept Infliximab Adalimumab |
Disease at baseline |
|
Treatment with Acthar Gel |
|
RAPID3 disease activity measures |
Baseline: 20.7 After 4 weeks: 14.3 |
Case 2: 46-year-old male
Disease duration: 1.5 yrs
Previous treatments |
Adalimumab Certolizumab |
Disease at baseline |
|
Treatment with Acthar Gel |
|
RAPID3 disease activity measures |
Baseline: 7.5 After ~12 weeks: 6.2 |
PIP=proximal interphalangeal.
Case 3: 51-year-old female
Disease duration: 5 yrs
Previous treatments |
Certolizumab Adalimumab Infliximab |
Disease at baseline |
|
Treatment with Acthar Gel |
|
RAPID3 disease activity measures |
Baseline: 9.7 After 8 weeks: 3.0 |
Case 4: 55-year-old female
Disease duration: 7.5 yrs
Previous treatments |
Etanercept Golimumab Infliximab Adalimumab Methotrexate |
Disease at baseline |
|
Treatment with Acthar Gel |
|
RAPID3 disease activity measures |
Baseline: 19.3 After 8 weeks: 3.0 |
CRP=C-reactive protein;
ESR=erythrocyte sedimentation rate.
Case 5: 58-year-old male
Disease duration: 8 yrs
Previous treatments |
Adalimumab Certolizumab |
Disease at baseline |
|
Treatment with Acthar Gel |
|
RAPID3 disease activity measures |
Baseline: 8.3 After 12 weeks: 6.0 |
Case 6: 66-year-old female
Disease duration: 5 yrs
Previous treatments |
Methotrexate Adalimumab Ustekinumab |
Disease at baseline |
|
Treatment with Acthar Gel |
|
RAPID3 disease activity measures |
Not recorded |
CRP=C-reactive protein;
ESR=erythrocyte sedimentation rate;
PIP=proximal interphalangeal.
Case 7: 37-year-old male
Disease duration: 2 yrs
Previous treatments |
Adalimumab |
Disease at baseline |
|
Treatment with Acthar Gel |
|
RAPID3 disease activity measures |
Baseline: 4.0 After 3 months: 2.8 |
Case 8: 69-year-old female
Disease duration: 7 yrs
Previous treatments |
Adalimumab Methotrexate Certolizumab monotherapy |
Disease at baseline |
|
Treatment with Acthar Gel |
|
RAPID3 disease activity measures |
Not recorded |
Case 9: 48-year-old female
Disease duration: 19 yrs
Previous treatments |
Adalimumab Certolizumab |
Disease at baseline |
|
Treatment with Acthar Gel |
|
RAPID3 disease activity measures |
Not recorded |
Safety Findings
- Three patients discontinued due to worsening of preexisting conditions or other adverse events, including hypertension (n=2), hyperglycemia (n=1), and weight gain (n=2)
- No other adverse events were reported during treatment with Acthar Gel