Gillis T, Crane M, Hinkle C, and Wei N —Open Access Rheumatology, 2017
Acthar Gel was evaluated in patients with active disease and had been previously treated with ≥3 therapeutic agents with a different MOA1
STUDY OBJECTIVE
An open-label, interventional, single-group study of 8 patients with refractory and active RA1
- Refractory disease defined as treated with 3 therapeutic agents with a different mechanism of action (MOA) for more than 3 months
- Active disease defined as 6 tender and 6 swollen joints
- Patients received Acthar Gel 80 U twice weekly via subcutaneous injection over 12 weeks
Patient Characteristics
Mean age | Mean disease duration |
64.6 | 20.9 years |
Previous treatments | |
Tofacitinib citrate Certolizumab pegol Abatacept Etanercept Hydroxychloroquine Adalimumab Tocilizumab |
|
Concomitant treatments* | |
Certolizumab pegol Methotrexate Prednisone Morphine sulfur Cyclobenzaprine Acetaminophen Hydromorphone Abatacept Celecoxib Meloxicam Etanercept Rituximab Tofacitinib citrate |
|
Mean tender joint count (baseline) |
Mean swollen joint count (baseline) |
31.4 | 31 |
Mean age | Mean disease duration |
Previous treatments | Concomitant treatments* |
Mean tender joint count (baseline) |
Mean swollen joint count (baseline) |
64.6 | 20.9 years | Tofacitinib citrate Certolizumab pegol Abatacept Etanercept Hydroxychloroquine Adalimumab Tocilizumab |
Certolizumab pegol Methotrexate Prednisone Morphine sulfur Cyclobenzaprine Acetaminophen Hydromorphone Abatacept Celecoxib Meloxicam Etanercept Rituximab Tofacitinib citrate |
31.4 | 31 |
*Not every patient was on the same concomitant treatments.
Study Assessments
- Primary endpoint measures included the Ritchie-Camp Articular (RCA) Index and 20-item Health Assessment Questionnaire† (HAQ) scores prior to treatment and at 2- to 4-week intervals
- Secondary endpoint measures included acute erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels
†Health Assessment Questionnaire assesses patient outcomes in 4 domains: disability, discomfort and pain, drug side effects, and cost. It includes 8 sections—dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common activities.
Study Limitations
- This was a small study with only 8 patients and no comparator arm
- Sample bias may exist since this was an open-label trial and patients and physicians were aware that they were receiving Acthar Gel
- The results of the study cannot be solely attributable to Acthar Gel since patients were on different medications at the start of the trial and no washout periods or standardization of concomitant medications were undertaken
- Acthar Gel has not been formally studied in combination with other treatments
Clinical characteristics at baseline and at week 12 of Acthar Gel treatment
Characteristics | Baseline | At Week 12 |
P value |
Tender joint count |
.0047 | ||
Mean (SD) | 31.4 (16.3) | 10.9 (9.1) | |
Median | 33.5 | 9.0 | |
Range | 7–50 | 0–26 | |
Swollen joint count |
.0004 | ||
Mean (SD) | 32.9 (10.74) | 20.8 (9.6) | |
Median | 36 | 20.8 | |
Range | 17–48 | 6–37 | |
HAQ score | .1249 | ||
Mean (SD) | 1.78 (0.71) | 1.4 (0.76) | |
Median | 1.75 | 1.3 | |
Range | 0.875–2.75 | 0.38–2.5 | |
ESR (mm/h) | .8996 | ||
Mean (SD) | 21.5 (16.5) | 17.3 (10.3) | |
Median | 16 | 16.0 | |
Range | 7–60 | 5–32 | |
CRP (mg/L) | .4776 | ||
Mean (SD) | 0.825 (0.6) | 1.0 (1.3) | |
Median | 0.9 | 0.45 | |
Range | 0.1–1.8 | 0.1–3.8 | |
Patient VAS | .0220 | ||
Mean (SD) | 40.1 (30.3) | 16.9 (14.8) | |
Median | 28.5 | 17 | |
Range | 8–97 | 1–40 | |
Physician VAS |
.0002 | ||
Mean (SD) | 7.6 (2.2) | 2.9 (2.2) | |
Median | 8.4 | 2.5 | |
Range | 3.8–9.9 | 0.30–6.5 | |
DAS28 | .0032 | ||
Mean (SD) | 5.7 (0.84) | 3.8 (1.2) | |
Median | 5.83 | 3.4 | |
Range | 4.33–6.87 | 2.5–5.6 |
Characteristics | Baseline | At Week 12 | P value |
Tender joint count | .0047 | ||
Mean (SD) | 31.4 (16.3) | 10.9 (9.1) | |
Median | 33.5 | 9.0 | |
Range | 7–50 | 0–26 | |
Swollen joint count | .0004 | ||
Mean (SD) | 32.9 (10.74) | 20.8 (9.6) | |
Median | 36 | 20.8 | |
Range | 17–48 | 6–37 | |
HAQ score | .1249 | ||
Mean (SD) | 1.78 (0.71) | 1.4 (0.76) | |
Median | 1.75 | 1.3 | |
Range | 0.875–2.75 | 0.38–2.5 | |
ESR (mm/h) | .8996 | ||
Mean (SD) | 21.5 (16.5) | 17.3 (10.3) | |
Median | 16 | 16.0 | |
Range | 7–60 | 5–32 | |
CRP (mg/L) | .4776 | ||
Mean (SD) | 0.825 (0.6) | 1.0 (1.3) | |
Median | 0.9 | 0.45 | |
Range | 0.1–1.8 | 0.1–3.8 | |
Patient VAS | .0220 | ||
Mean (SD) | 40.1 (30.3) | 16.9 (14.8) | |
Median | 28.5 | 17 | |
Range | 8–97 | 0–40 | |
Physician VAS | .0002 | ||
Mean (SD) | 7.6 (2.2) | 2.9 (2.2) | |
Median | 8.4 | 2.5 | |
Range | 3.8–9.9 | 0.30–6.5 | |
DAS28 | .0032 | ||
Mean (SD) | 5.7 (0.84) | 3.8 (1.2) | |
Median | 5.83 | 3.4 | |
Range | 4.33–6.87 | 2.5–5.6 |
- When Acthar Gel therapy was stopped, all improvements gained during the study period were lost by week 16
Safety Findings
Investigators reported that the majority of adverse events reported were mild and resolved and/or were unrelated to Acthar Gel.
Patients who experienced an adverse event |
10 |
Adverse event | |
Reaction at injection site | 1 |
Hypoglycemia | 1 |
Hip pain | 1 |
Development of allergies | 1 |
Pneumonia | 1 |
Atrial fibrillation | 1 |
Fibromyalgia | 1 |
Hypertension | 1 |
Serious adverse event | |
Pulmonary embolism | 1 |
Deep vein thrombosis | 1 |
Patients who experienced an adverse event |
10 |
Adverse event | |
Reaction at injection site | 1 |
Hypoglycemia | 1 |
Hip pain | 1 |
Development of allergies | 1 |
Pneumonia | 1 |
Atrial fibrillation | 1 |
Fibromyalgia | 1 |
Hypertension | 1 |
Serious adverse event | |
Pulmonary embolism | 1 |
Deep vein thrombosis | 1 |
CRP=C-reactive protein. DAS28=disease activity score-28. ESR=erythrocyte sedimentation rate. HAQ=health assessment questionnaire. SD=standard deviation. VAS=visual analog scale.